‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

1902 points · 962 comments · ereiamjh

  1. petetnt · · focus · HN ↗
    The author claims that the AI posters don’t have to be horrible, but fail to see that the dozen variations generated are not distinctive - they might have somewhat different typography or imaginary, but still have the same AI uniformity and smell as the crappy restaurant poster you see on the street. The core issue is not only technical, but also the lack of vision and imagination when creating art or even infographics.
    1. bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
      The alternative is WordArt, or just black on white Comic Sans with some bolding and font size variations with bad ClipArt. These small scale events would never hire a professional.

      I'm old enough to remember that people also complained about WordArt and Clipart and too many fonts etc.

      I see the chatgpt poster style on many small-scale local village events also. But again, what they replace wasn't any better. It's not replacing some beautiful craft that existed before.

      1. wiether · · focus · HN ↗

          > I'm old enough to remember that people also complained about WordArt and Clipart and too many fonts etc.
        
        We basically had two kinds of posters:

          - those made by someone skilled/savvy (not necessarily a professional)
          - those made by someone without skills/knowledge
        
        The later were awful, in the sense that I would never display them in my home as a reminder of a an event I took part in.

        But still, they were nice because you knew someone took the time to create them to promote an event and share the important information about it, and each person was producing their own awful posters.

        Now with gen AI we have something filled with trash, everything looks the same, the important information is hard to find...

        Sure, the variations offered in the article are a bit better and more opinionated, but they still reek AI conformity and I feel sick looking at them.

        1. bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
          Some level of uniformity is fine and indeed the norm. It was uniform back when posters were hand painted, eg 19th century world fairs or zoo openings or theater posters. They look pretty similar. Carneval posters looked similar.

          The expectation of some kaleidoscope of styles is not really grounded in how things used to be ever.

          Also, it's just nostalgia, just like how some young people now think audio cassettes and discmans are "cool" and have some revival, some are nostalgic for the back-in-the-day Word posters because "at least back then", but "these days" it's decline etc. Pretty sure in a few years people will be nostalgic for crappy AI slop of 2025-26 because their shittiness will feel like some charm compared to whatever the AI will be able to do.

          1. nephihaha · · focus · HN ↗
            Sorry, but Walkmans and Discmans were considered cool... At the time.

            Personally I like simple designs. I always remind people who make posters that whoever looks at them will only do so for a matter of seconds. If you want extensive detail, put it in smaller print. Put the main hook in large letters and a brief description.

            1. bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
              But they became uncool when the iPod and mp3 players came out. Nobody felt sentimental about VHS artifacts either, and now it's a genz aesthetic or something. These things cycle, like I'm sure some old folks miss the radio hiss and listening to football matches with just audio.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.