The author claims that the AI posters don’t have to be horrible, but fail to see that the dozen variations generated are not distinctive - they might have somewhat different typography or imaginary, but still have the same AI uniformity and smell as the crappy restaurant poster you see on the street. The core issue is not only technical, but also the lack of vision and imagination when creating art or even infographics.
The alternative is WordArt, or just black on white Comic Sans with some bolding and font size variations with bad ClipArt. These small scale events would never hire a professional.
I'm old enough to remember that people also complained about WordArt and Clipart and too many fonts etc.
I see the chatgpt poster style on many small-scale local village events also. But again, what they replace wasn't any better. It's not replacing some beautiful craft that existed before.
> But again, what they replace wasn't any better.
I would argue otherwise.
whereas before I'd take a glance and go "hm interesting" or whatever, with these its just "oh look, it's AI slop" and that's all I will notice
> who have a visceral reaction to the concept of AI
why do you think this is the reason?
should I be cheering and clapping when someone goes on chatgpt and say "make me a poster" and they think they're a genius when this slop comes out?
God forbid some town volunteer make a poster in 30 seconds instead of taking a college course to please some huffy internet commentators with an axe to grind
People take photos with their cell phones instead of painting a scene like Rembrandt. They don't think they are a genius, and nobody cheers and claps. The photos look fine, they get the job done, and everyone moves on with their lives without projecting insecurities online.
petetnt · · focus · HN ↗
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
I'm old enough to remember that people also complained about WordArt and Clipart and too many fonts etc.
I see the chatgpt poster style on many small-scale local village events also. But again, what they replace wasn't any better. It's not replacing some beautiful craft that existed before.
r_lee · · focus · HN ↗
I would argue otherwise.
whereas before I'd take a glance and go "hm interesting" or whatever, with these its just "oh look, it's AI slop" and that's all I will notice
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
r_lee · · focus · HN ↗
why do you think this is the reason?
should I be cheering and clapping when someone goes on chatgpt and say "make me a poster" and they think they're a genius when this slop comes out?
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
r_lee · · focus · HN ↗
should I be complimenting these default AI slop posters or be feeling good about them?
I never felt this way towards low effort / simple posters before, I thought they were fine
bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
r_lee · · focus · HN ↗
drstewart · · focus · HN ↗
dolebirchwood · · focus · HN ↗
breezybottom · · focus · HN ↗