‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

1902 points · 962 comments · ereiamjh

  1. ereiamjh · · focus · HN ↗
    Everyone's sick of seeing the same default ChatGPT style on posters for everything from village fetes to coffee shops to school plays.

    But I'm convinced that just vetoing AI is to throw away the baby with the bathwater. So I set out to prove it.

    1. tgv · · focus · HN ↗
      What do we loose when we ditch generative AI? Easier poster making? What good does that do? So now pop&mom can have a poster in their shop that looks as if some graphic artist was paid for it, but wasn't. Will that drive the economy up? Improve poverty? Halt the war? Make life more tolerable? No, it just adds the pretense of having a professional designer, something that will quickly loose its added value when everybody does it.
      1. bonoboTP · · focus · HN ↗
        That's true. Since ornamentation is effort-signaling, it may get dropped once it's cheap. Same thing that happened with clothing and home decor. The functional part may be beneficial though, even on utilitarian grounds. But yes, a lot of design is not about function but social signaling and fashion.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.