‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

If math is more than proof, we need to better celebrate the rest of it

433 points · 285 comments · num42

  1. random3 · · focus · HN ↗
    While I understand and emphatically with Tao's concern I'm afraid it's missing the forest from the trees. Unless you can make a claim that AI will never be able to perform intellectually at the same level as any human at a much lower cost, there's an outstanding utility problem that remains unaddressed. Sure enough, the AI may not have taste or goals, or many human traits, but that's irrelevant to the much thornier (and much broader than mathematics or even academia) question related to who's getting paid how much and for what.
    1. layer8 · · focus · HN ↗
      > Tao's concern

      The article isn’t by Tao, it’s a guest post by Grant Sanderson (aka 3Blue1Brown).

      1. random3 · · focus · HN ↗
        Indeed. I missed the top row. Thanks for pointing that.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.