Thread

1. geuis · 1789799789 · focus · HN ↗

   This isn't peer reviewed, just a press release. 10 other "papers" will be published in the next 2 weeks counterfinding anything in this post.

   Science moves forward yet again with a few backward steps.

   1. pazimzadeh · 1789802189 · focus · HN ↗

      no idea what you're talking about.

      watson and crick's paper was not peer reviewed, neither were darwin's papers.

      not sure what you think happens in peer review but it's probably overrated.

      1. nephihaha · 1789802878 · focus · HN ↗

         The problem right now is that there aren't enough peer reviewers.

         1. pazimzadeh · 1789804267 · focus · HN ↗

            I don't think that's the problem.

            One problem is that there's no good incentive to spend significant time doing good peer review.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.