I looked up onions, lettuce and tomatoes (because burgers), and the volatility actually looks very similar. Am I missing something or looking at the wrong things?
People are willing to lose a small but predictable amount of money to avoid occasionally and unpredictably losing a massive amount of money. The former is a loss they can plan for and absorb. The latter might kill their business.
Traders are often happy to take the other side of that trade because they can trade against many counterparties, collect a small premium from each one, and try to ensure their counterparties won’t all fail in a correlated way.
You may have liabilities or income that exist outside of financial markets e.g. if I have 500t of wheat due to be harvested I might want to hedge enough to guarantee I can pay my staff - ive locked in the price of wheat, I might make less money as a result but my risk is lower.
cwal37 · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion_Futures_Act" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion_Futures_Act
(which also banned box office receipt futures)
A fun thing is to go on FRED and make a graph with prices from onions and, say, corn to see the differences in volatility.
chirau · · focus · HN ↗
Tomato: <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU01130217" rel="nofollow">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU01130217 Onion: <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU01130216" rel="nofollow">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU01130216 Lettuce: <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU01130215" rel="nofollow">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU01130215
gradus_ad · · focus · HN ↗
brookst · · focus · HN ↗
brudgers · · focus · HN ↗
mhh__ · · focus · HN ↗
brudgers · · focus · HN ↗
chadgpt6 · · focus · HN ↗
brookst · · focus · HN ↗
I’ll keep paying though.
articulatepang · · focus · HN ↗
Traders are often happy to take the other side of that trade because they can trade against many counterparties, collect a small premium from each one, and try to ensure their counterparties won’t all fail in a correlated way.
brudgers · · focus · HN ↗
brookst · · focus · HN ↗
Would you rather have net profits of 20, -10, 15, -5, -10, 25, -5 year over year, or profits of 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5?
brudgers · · focus · HN ↗
brookst · · focus · HN ↗
Your hung up on money, everyone is trying to explain that the exact same money is better when it is predictable versus erratic.
brudgers · · focus · HN ↗
Yes, it is about the money.
mhh__ · · focus · HN ↗
brudgers · · focus · HN ↗
And rarely is done by farmers.