‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Science Is Open Software

162 points · 75 comments · jegp

  1. flopsamjetsam · · focus · HN ↗
    > Every result is instantly reproducible. When you read a paper claiming that a new drug reduces symptoms by 30%, you click a link and watch the exact analysis run in your browser. The data processing, statistical tests, and visualizations execute in seconds using the same environment the authors used—preserved perfectly through reproducible containers.

    At least some journals have this as a stipulation e.g. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;nature-portfolio&#x2F;editorial-policies&#x2F;reporting-standards" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;nature-portfolio&#x2F;editorial-policies&#x2F;r...

    Particularly the &quot;data availability&quot; and &quot;Availability and peer review of computer code and algorithm&quot;.

    However, in my limited experience, of trying to reproduce certain scRNA-seq processing pipelines, in practice it&#x27;s never available as just a Github link. I can understand that some&#x2F;many researcher&#x27;s code is not in good shape, so I think it&#x27;ll be quite a stretch to have this available.

    I do think it&#x27;s laudable though, to try and make it available. It would certainly have been very useful for me in the past.

    1. zipy124 · · focus · HN ↗
      One problem is who should pay for the data storage? Some of my academic experiments generated vast quantities of data. Who will pay to store it all, and how long should it be stored for?
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.