Thread

1. bitcurious · 1789773644 · focus · HN ↗

   > The newspaper also reported, citing another unidentified official, that not all of the undisclosed deaths were directly tied to the months-long conflict but involved US personnel who were in the Middle East amid ongoing hostilities.

   If someone dies near a war, but not due to the war, is it really fair to count them as a war fatality?

   1. lukan · 1789773824 · focus · HN ↗

      If they are killed by houthi drones and not iranian drones, I would think so.

      If someone on a military base with no attacks going on, got a heart attack by watching the news, probably not a war fatality.

      But we don't know, so any concrete speculation is probably not very helpful.

      1. AnotherGoodName · 1789774086 · focus · HN ↗

         To get more specific this often means 'suicide' which absolutely is a casualty of war given the strain of war conditions, especially given the logistics concerns and duration of tours that they are forcing right now.

         1. Freedom2 · 1789777619 · focus · HN ↗

            What logistics concerns are there? Isn't the US supposed to be one of the best at managing wartime logistics, which is why they have bases all around the world?

            1. solid_fuel · 1789778343 · focus · HN ↗

               They put an alcoholic fox news host in charge of the military and he fired or otherwise forced out a ton of experienced leaders in the name of "the warrior ethos" and "high testosterone soldiers".

               In a completely unrelated development the "worlds best logistics organization" is now having trouble with logistics.

               1. fittingopposite · 1789846923 · focus · HN ↗

                  Man I had to read twice. Wondered what an "alcoholic fox" is...

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.