Thread

1. bloppe · 1789759388 · focus · HN ↗

   I thought this was about all the illegible jargon

   1. TZubiri · 1789760151 · focus · HN ↗

      >" However, various strands of evidence indicate that a"

      Strands of evidence? My best guess would be that:

      0- this is ai generated slop

      1- it's using that watermarking technique

      2- it's obviously detectable and degrades quality

      3- it's amplified when inferencing on its own content and generates slop

      1. EagnaIonat · 1789794635 · focus · HN ↗

         I would have more contention with "Dynamic taint", but the paper doesn't appear to be AI slop at all.

         As I understand the paper they are saying the reasoning/thinking you see is actually a translation of what is actually going on, and stuff can be lost in the translation. Similar to what was observed in j-space.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.