‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Saving another 100TB of RAM

488 points · 123 comments · f311a

  1. nopurpose · · focus · HN ↗
    Do I understand correctly, that they spent memory storing largish N hash values per server, so that request hash determines which server to send request to using closest higher value of all server hashes?

    That in effect boils down to consistently selecting server S with probability P, where P is function of weight and total number of servers?

    Surely there must be better way to select server with a given probability without storing a massive lookup table of hashes? Randevouz hashing of some sorts

    1. varispeed · · focus · HN ↗
      Who cares if you can buy all the RAM available. To hell with small business and working class who now cannot afford it.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.