‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Saving another 100TB of RAM

488 points · 123 comments · f311a

  1. zer0x4d · · focus · HN ↗
    Incredibly happy to see this series of CF articles. I was always so proud of devs back in the days where RAM and processing were scarce and who had to get creative to fit even the most basic stuff in the budget. It seemed to me that after RAM and processing became abundant, most gave up on optimization and focused on shipping instead which meant now that even with several cores, a basic notepad or music player failed to work. In a way, RAM becoming more expensive has ushered in a new era of forced optimizations, which I'm really happy for
    1. jfengel · · focus · HN ↗
      I don't remember those days with a ton of fondness. Yes, the challenge was fun, but I really wanted to ship it and get my product in the hands of customers. Now I can spend more time thinking about what they want and less time about what the computer wants.
      1. rstat1 · · focus · HN ↗
        And its this obsession with shipping things as fast as possible quality be dammed that got us basic weather apps that eat a gigabyte+ of RAM.
        1. CookieCrisp · · focus · HN ↗
          And yet the world still turned
          1. latexr · · focus · HN ↗
            That statement can be used to justify anything, to the point it is utterly useless.

            — Humanity has been on the decline. People are hateful towards each other, striking their fellow man and poisoning the environment. Despots eventually launched nukes which killed everyone but the cockroaches.

            — And yet the world still turned.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.