‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

US Military had close call after using AI for hallucinated intelligence report

519 points · 396 comments · realsarm

  1. drtgh · · focus · HN ↗
    > relatively poorly understood technology

    Poorly understood? how convenient...

    LLMs are vectorial databases with losses that index statistically filled data, which uses a text interface to query such statistically filled data. The output is a string concatenation (statistically concatenated bit by bit).

    When the LLMs are queried (prompted), you can get random mixed data as output, ERRORS, due to undesired indexes getting closer at one point while the string was being concatenated for the output, what affects the rest of the indexed content that will be concatenated.

    It is intrinsic to this tech. The larger the context, the greater the probability of get mixed data. And if the provider lowers the precision of those indexes -in order to decrease hardware resources and energy consumption- such probability increases to the point where those errors are granted.

    Even knowing that the queries can return wrong/mixed data in the responses, errors, the companies developing this, decided to introduce a new product, that connects such LLMs outputs to the command console, latter connected to internet, raw 'eval' running commands from such outputs witch obviously can contain whatever mixed random. Then we started to hear "oh, it deleted my directory", etc, and it seems the next one will be "a missile killed my wife", because it is a text concatenation engine with errors.

    To name it "hallucination" is an euphemism... those are errors, and they are granted to happen at one moment. If they do not know this, then they ate too much marketing without doing their job, or it was a convenient contract for the pocket$ of someone.

    1. margalabargala · · focus · HN ↗
      I agree with most of your comment, but...

      > To name it "hallucination" is an euphemism... those are errors

      I find this and other "don't anthropomorphize the computer" statements incredibly unconvincing.

      People develop terms for things and language has always contained overloaded or "literally inaccurate" terms.

      An LLM can have "hallucinations" in the same way a modern computer program can have "bugs".

      1. jacquesm · · focus · HN ↗
        OpenAI calls them 'mistakes'. But that's just a fig leaf.

        Google does it too: "AI responses may include mistakes."

        Mistakes have an air of innocence. But these are not mistakes, they are purposefully releasing stuff that they know is broken, they just don't know when it is broken...

        1. s1artibartfast · · focus · HN ↗
          Broken is a little hyperbolic.

          Lots of totally viable essential or everyday products are not perfectly reliable.

          Medicine is not 100% reliable. My car isn't 100% reliable. Hell, my phone and cellular network are not 100% reliable.

          They are all still extremely useful tools. I might want them to be even better, but that's a cost versus quality question.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.