‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Systemd is a suite of basic building blocks

37 points · 71 comments · Bluestein

  1. 0xbadcafebee · · focus · HN ↗
    "Building blocks" makes it sound like things you can use to build other things. In reality it's more of an octopus, or a fungus.
    1. 9dev · · focus · HN ↗
      But that’s precisely what it allows you to do: plug a socket unit into a service unit, connect a timer unit, then another service as a dependency… and that’s just for the init management. Systemd might not fit your personal stylistic preferences, but most of all it’s consistent.
      1. Joker_vD · · focus · HN ↗
        Yeah, like what Upstart did! Why did we switch away from that, again?
        1. c-hendricks · · focus · HN ↗
          Didn't have timers for one, or the same level of support around sockets.
        2. the_why_of_y · · focus · HN ↗
          Because firstly, it had a broken architecture.

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugs.launchpad.net&#x2F;upstart&#x2F;+bug&#x2F;406397&#x2F;comments&#x2F;21" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugs.launchpad.net&#x2F;upstart&#x2F;+bug&#x2F;406397&#x2F;comments&#x2F;21

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugs.launchpad.net&#x2F;upstart&#x2F;+bug&#x2F;447654&#x2F;comments&#x2F;6" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugs.launchpad.net&#x2F;upstart&#x2F;+bug&#x2F;447654&#x2F;comments&#x2F;6

          Secondly, Canonical required copyright assignment for any contribution to Upstart, and Lennart&#x2F;Kay decided that if they basically have to substantially rewrite it to fix the broken architecture, they better do it in a new project with no copyright assignment barriers.

          See the comments in this thread by Upstart author and former Canonical employee Scott James Remnant:

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20140928104327&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plus.google.com&#x2F;+KaySievers&#x2F;posts&#x2F;C3chC26khpq" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20140928104327&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plus.goog...

          Had the CLA not been in place, the result of the LF Collab discussions would have almost certainly been contributions of patches from +Kay Sievers and Lennart (after all, we&#x27;d all worked together on things like udev, and got along) that would have fixed all those design issues, etc.

          But the CLA prevented them from doing that (I won&#x27;t sign the CLA myself, which is one reason I don&#x27;t contribute since leaving Canonical - so I hold no grudges here), so history happened differently. After our April 2010 meeting, Lennart went away and wrote systemd, which was released in July 2010 if memory serves.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.