‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Systemd is a suite of basic building blocks

37 points · 71 comments · Bluestein

  1. jauntywundrkind · · focus · HN ↗
    This is just the homepage. Bah. I was hopeful this might be more! I would genuinely love for some posting on systemd that can actually talk to this.

    There's posts on using systemd for this or that, which are fine, but it feels like the pro-systemd camp doesn't find or make opportunities to rally, to express ths vision, where-as the anti-vision (as ever) sells itself, is a magnet that makes common party out of all dissent.

    1. akerl_ · · focus · HN ↗
      Given that the overwhelming majority of Linux distros have moved to systemd, it's not clear why the pro-systemd camp would need to be finding or making opportunities to rally.

      They're spending their time build and improving systemd's set of building blocks.

      1. jauntywundrkind · · focus · HN ↗
        The drift, the gap between the advanced guard of seasoned enjoyers and the rest of the world that doesn't know what their missing feels like material that deserves coverage to me?

        Just stay heads down and keep doing the world, don't share, dont socialize has been the plan so far in a lot of open source. And I think the outcomes would be better if we tried methodologies other than this. Freaking weird that this is just accepted.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.