‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

US Treasuries Have Become Unappetizing for Foreign Central Banks and Governments

152 points · 132 comments · iamnothere

  1. 1over137 · · focus · HN ↗
    US everything has become unappetizing for everyone outside the US.
    1. toomuchtodo · · focus · HN ↗
      Exorbitant privilege is a gift that lasts only as long as the trust does.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Exorbitant_privilege" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Exorbitant_privilege

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47635834">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47635834 covers this succinctly:

      &gt; America was in practice running an empire that collected tribute from the rest of planet earth in exchange for entries in a database denominated in a currency they controlled and that was accepted everywhere. Really the only way it could go wrong is putting it under the control of someone who doesn&#x27;t understand the kayfabe...

      from

      Gold overtakes U.S. Treasuries as the largest foreign reserve asset - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47635056">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47635056 - April 2026 (250 comments)

      1. rayiner · · focus · HN ↗
        This argument fundamentally does not make sense. Look at a chart of U.S. GDP per capita growth: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;substackcdn.com&#x2F;image&#x2F;fetch&#x2F;$s_!zSCw!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep&#x2F;https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fafa99d7e-749e-4e36-bf66-b4a7a043613e_2048x1249.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;substackcdn.com&#x2F;image&#x2F;fetch&#x2F;$s_!zSCw!,f_auto,q_auto:...

        The U.S. was growing at the same rate or faster as the UK from 1830 to 1930, when the UK had an empire and the U.S. didn’t. Then, in the second half of the 20th century when the U.S. had an empire and the UK didn’t, the growth rates were more or less the same in both places in the long run trend (ignoring the UK’s step change hit from WWII).

        1. stbede · · focus · HN ↗
          Wouldn&#x27;t the more relevant point of comparison be the difference between long-term government bonds. The exorbitant privilege is that it&#x27;s easier to fund US government debt because trade in USD means that large institutions around the world need USD and store those dollars in the form of US treasuries, which in turn lead to lower bond rates and cheaper debt.
          1. rayiner · · focus · HN ↗
            What we care about at the end of the day is bottom line economic growth, specifically GDP per capita growth. Whether government debt is more or less expensive is a collateral matter. It just means you need to make different choices in taxation versus borrowing—as long as the end result is the same how does it matter?
            1. stbede · · focus · HN ↗
              What we care about and what the exorbitant privilege is referring to can be different things.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.