US Treasuries Have Become Unappetizing for Foreign Central Banks and Governments
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
US Treasuries Have Become Unappetizing for Foreign Central Banks and Governments
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Arubis · · focus · HN ↗
It's not without its benefits -- over the last couple decade, the US has found ways to weaponize access to USD, so if you're not a fan of having a country other than your own able to effectively regulate or sanction you and your business, there's some niceties here.
Being able to trade and invest in a stable, highly liquid, easily converted, low risk currency was a net win for most of the world for about half a century. There isn't an obvious replacement, so we'll just see more friction.
nostrademons · · focus · HN ↗
The problem with replacing the world reserve currency with something else is that nobody can agree on what that something else should be. Expect to see a lot of jockeying for power as people realize the U.S. isn't the world hegemon anymore. Jockeying, on a state level, usually means war.
tehjoker · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor
Recall that America is currently attacking Iran without provocation and is aiding a genocide.
rdm_blackhole · · focus · HN ↗
Finally there has to be a certain willingness from other countries to accept this new currency and I just don't see the EU countries conducting all their international trade in yuan anytime soon.
Finally replacing the USD is just one part. The second part is how to stop the next currency from being weaponized just like the USD is/was. Without the answer to that question, then switching to a new reserve currency is just replacing one problem with another.
nostrademons · · focus · HN ↗
A stable, simple cryptocurrency is ideal for this. Not only is it not controlled by any nation state, it's not controlled by anyone. It's just there, a tradable asset that has mathematically-defined rules for how many will ever be created. Also gets around the Triffin Dilemma by not being used as a national currency, or for general consumer purchases.
The international settlement use-case also gets around two of the traditional weaknesses of Bitcoin. The fact that it's deflationary is not concerning when used as a unit of international settlement, because national currencies can be made to be inflationary to spur consumer activity, and then just float relative to Bitcoin. And its low TPS limits also don't matter much when it's only used for general international settlement between large financial entities, rather than as a payment coin for ordinary consumer purchases.
watwut · · focus · HN ↗