Thread

1. carefree-bob · 1789760305 · focus · HN ↗

   There was a book in the 1970s called "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind" by Julian Jaynes, where he argued that ancient civilizations -- and he used examples from Homer -- lacked the current modern sense of self-consciousness. If you look at their behavior, they interact with some external divine voice that drives their actions, whereas if you read modern literature you see people being driven by an inner voice which they associate with themselves.

   This shift from the &quot;bicameral mentality&quot; of the external voice to the modern mentality of the inner voice was hypothesized by Jaynes to be rooted in some biological changes in the brain. At the time there was split brain research that showed these two parts of the brain function independently almost as two different minds in the same skull. See this 2007 survey: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.researchgate.net&#x2F;publication&#x2F;6323702_The_bicameral_mind30_years_on_A_critical_reappraisal_of_Julian_Jaynes&#x27;_hypothesis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.researchgate.net&#x2F;publication&#x2F;6323702_The_bicamer...

   1. spragl · 1789804738 · focus · HN ↗

      His theory was that the two brain halves communicated through inner voices. Wernickes Area, on the left side, communicated with the similar area on the right side. WA is where we comprehend speech, so Jaynes theorized that was why bicameral people experienced the communication as inner voices.

      The research in the new research paper is about a split between front and back of the brain. So something entirely different. That split is an old idea. Jaynes would most likely have known about it. But it wasnt part of his theory.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.