I don't know why the author could claim this is "their" proof, and they kept saying "they" did this, "they" built that. but in reality everything is done by the LLM and the author is merely asking it to do things. i guess they did contribute money at least...
Author here! My impression is that it's customary in the mathematical community to take responsibility for the result with your name, regardless of whether it came from LLM etc (as long as you disclose LLM usage). I am perfectly fine calling it "LLM's proof" or somehow else, but it's "my" in the sense that "if there is a mistake in it, it is my mistake".
nialv7 · · focus · HN ↗
> Me: btw how’s your mood overall?
LOL. mood??
danabramov · · focus · HN ↗
GPerson · · focus · HN ↗
danabramov · · focus · HN ↗
GPerson · · focus · HN ↗