‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

I vibed a proof of Conway's conjecture

271 points · 297 comments · m-hodges

  1. howunfortunate · · focus · HN ↗
    > On the second day, there are two gaps: “between nothing and zero” and “between zero and nothing”. Two numbers spawn in those two gaps. Call them –1 and 1.

    Got lost here. I think I'm officially too dumb for math.

    1. dubcanada · · focus · HN ↗
      I think it's just we don't have a way to say/write these numbers. So you make up a way to write them (-1 and 1) and continue.

      The numbers don't matter and you could replace -1 and 1 with anything. It's just easier to begin your new fake number at - 1 and 1. Because position does matter.

      1. xg15 · · focus · HN ↗
        There has to be some procedure how to come up with "new" numbers though, if you want to have more in the end than just a fancy binary tree - in particular if you want to map your "fake numbers" to the reals, infinity, etc.
        1. danabramov · · focus · HN ↗
          This procedure is enough. If you define addition and other operations in a certain way (as Conway did), it turns out that on the omega-th day (i.e. after initial infinite steps), all reals will be born.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.