‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Cloudflare Quick Tunnels

844 points · 316 comments · jcbhmr

  1. aliasxneo · · focus · HN ↗
    Tunneling was something that recently fell out of the work I've been doing [1]. I've used Cloudflare Tunnels before but I just have low trust with them recently with how big they are getting. All of these nice things come at the cost of pushing _a lot_ of traffic through their systems.

    [1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dntls.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-new-internet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dntls.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-new-internet

    1. pstoll · · focus · HN ↗
      Reality check - you are not pushing “_a lot_” of traffic relative to any hyperscaler or large scale CDN. They push hundreds of Tbps sustained. You don’t peak at a few Mbps.

      They can monitor extreme outliers. It’s not an issue for them.

      1. aliasxneo · · focus · HN ↗
        In hindsight, that was probably a confusing sentence. I was more pointing out how much traffic flows trough their systems which ends up making it an attractive honeypot, especially as a U.S. company.
        1. pstoll · · focus · HN ↗
          Sure any centralization of infra is an obvious risk for a myriad of reasons eg DoS, manipulation, honeypots, etc.

          But again my point applies - the chances they get enough people using it that it becomes a meaningfully worse security target than lots of other existing things seems … super low.

          It’s a big world, people make many choices I can’t understand (nix? Haskell? Php? &lt;flame wars to &#x2F;dev&#x2F;null&gt;). Even if this product nailed it - the number of people who can use it is minuscule - yes even as we add Claude-enabled PMs to the software dev ranks.

          Alt view with the old saying - “put all your eggs in one basket … and watch that basket!”

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.