Thread

Warren Buffett Steps Down as Berkshire Chairman, Names Son to Replace Him

323 points · 221 comments · saimiam

dugmartin · 1789732295 · focus · HN ↗
I guess Warren’s quote only applies to other people, not him. "It’s like choosing the 2020 Olympic team by picking the eldest sons of the gold-medal winners in the 2000 Olympics." (<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/14/us/dozens-of-rich-americans-join-in-fight-to-retain-the-estate-tax.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/14/us/dozens-of-rich-america...)
1. nlitened · 1789734152 · focus · HN ↗
  As I understand, the son is there not to lead the company (Greg Abel is the CEO), but to oversee their family's share in the enterprise.
  1. yuuu · 1789734967 · focus · HN ↗
    I thought he was giving away 99% of his wealth?
    Waterluvian · 1789739929 · focus · HN ↗
    Most of them seemingly have control problems where even if they do, it is in the form of a giant money pile still under their control that they give away the returns of, usually also completely under their control.
    toomuchtodo · 1789740361 · focus · HN ↗
    What's interesting is they cannot, but their ex partners go much further in their giving (Melinda French, MacKenzie Scott, for example).
    Waterluvian · 1789741152 · focus · HN ↗
    I wonder if there's a survivorship bias there: those who can and do reject the status quo.
    toomuchtodo · 1789741318 · focus · HN ↗
    My hot take is that men with extreme wealth and power are desperate to keep it as part of their identity, where the women I mentioned do not have the same character and personality flaws, and therefore use it as a tool to do good because they are not optimizing for status, power, and wealth: they are optimizing to do good. Doesn't always hold, there are exceptions.
    "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority." -- Lord Action
    seki285 · 1789743811 · focus · HN ↗
    There's a difference in men and women... until there's not. Very convenient.
    toomuchtodo · 1789744286 · focus · HN ↗
    There's a large body of medical research around women having more empathy than men, specifically around brain volume in the inferior frontal gyrus. Does it always hold? There are always exceptions. Broadly speaking, in most cases, it is a function of brain structure, per person. Do you have many examples of exceptional wealthy and powerful women who are monsters? I do not. I welcome corrections and citations, and am happy to be proven wrong on this.
    TLDR Show me the brain fMRI and I will show you the soul. In some cases, facial structure is enough for weak but meaningful signal (as a proxy for brain structure).
    (politics are also brain structure, citations in <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634883">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634883)
    fuzzfactor · 1789752071 · focus · HN ↗
    I know what you mean, nobody in North America understands vive la différence outside of French Canadians and Louisiana Cajuns.
    And some of them only at their own convenience.
    I wouldn't let it bother me, son of a gun I'm gonna have big fun on the bayou :)
    edit: not my downvote btw

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.