‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

OpenJev

722 points · 296 comments · ilreb

  1. jakozaur · · focus · HN ↗
    Yeah, real Jev got really weird, no benchmarking clause. Their Terms of Use (1(v)) and MCA (2.3(f)) both prohibit users from publishing "benchmarks or performance information about the Services". No major AI has it; we are back to Oracle-style legal.

    Though Jev is original, it looks highly replicable.

    1. cmrdporcupine · · focus · HN ↗
      There's also prior art. Or probably, anyways.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;LocalLLaMA&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1wijo3e&#x2F;i_literally_built_the_jev_architecture_one_year&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;LocalLLaMA&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1wijo3e&#x2F;i_liter...

      Not only is it replicable as you say, things like it already exist(ed).

      The important bit of course is in the actual implementation: a) models fine tuned to produce good results for these types of questions and b) runtimes optimized to do this quickly and at scale

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.