‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

OpenJev

722 points · 296 comments · ilreb

  1. wuhhh · · focus · HN ↗
    I don't understand how this is different from oai "structured output" (and whatever the similar paradigm was on Sonnet ~3.7 back then) which everyone moved on from. On their gh they say:

    "Jev is TypeSafe's closed service for runtime-defined semantic decisions. This project reproduces that interface pattern with open models; it does not reproduce Jev's undisclosed model or training"

    As someone else pointed out it isn't actually Jev... can someone enlighten me

    1. mritchie712 · · focus · HN ↗
      in short: it's faster, cheaper, smart structured output.

      each "question" is answered in parallel instead of a sequential (like an LLM). so if you have an input like:

          {"is_it_hotdog": noul, "is_it_apple", noul}
      
      
      it answers is_it_hotdog and is_it_apple in parallel and gives a probability.
      1. satvikpendem · · focus · HN ↗
        Can't I just parallelize my LLM calls myself for each question?
        1. orbital-decay · · focus · HN ↗
          You can. It will be expensive, slow, and less reliable than a specialized model.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.