I for one do not get the hate, nobody needs to use/or-waste-time-commenting on this project if they have no need/want. However, I do agree that it needs some more contributors on-board alongside with a couple months more support and bug squashing. And yes: better rewrite that website without the clanger involved in the wording! ;)
On a positive note: the performance is genuinely impressive.. what does it take to unlock this performance if I'm NOT running one of the big "usual" frameworks? The devil is always in the detail, best get some practical advice up on exactly what needs to happen with a medium piece of custom code to get it to said max performance.
dingdingdang · · focus · HN ↗
On a positive note: the performance is genuinely impressive.. what does it take to unlock this performance if I'm NOT running one of the big "usual" frameworks? The devil is always in the detail, best get some practical advice up on exactly what needs to happen with a medium piece of custom code to get it to said max performance.
0gs · · focus · HN ↗
is clanger:clanker::darn:damn? a softer touch. i like it
ok ok, or "dang"
(or did i mandela myself)
0gs · · focus · HN ↗
dingdingdang · · focus · HN ↗
As per one of the few, actually non-dangerous to children, children shows produced by the BBC in the 70s