Thread

1. vidarh · 1789721725 · focus · HN ↗

   > Those rethinks are load-bearing parts of your voice.

   I really hope this was intentional.

   1. caminante · 1789722657 · focus · HN ↗

      In context, he's just saying this self-scrutiny is what makes your words authentic.

      1. vidarh · 1789722961 · focus · HN ↗

         I was referring to the use of the word "load-bearing". It was most likely an intentional joke, but it's one of the most grating current AI-tells to the point it's a word you'll at this point generally want to avoid (unless it's a joke).

         1. caminante · 1789723683 · focus · HN ↗

            I figured that's what you meant and agree the phrasing is over-speak.

            To your comment, I wasn't aware of the eye rolling meta for the phrase [0]. I hadn't seen it overused to the extent people are claiming.

            [0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;ClaudeAI&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1upxk9r&#x2F;loadbearing&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;ClaudeAI&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1upxk9r&#x2F;loadbeari...

         2. dist-epoch · 1789727699 · focus · HN ↗

            Given that he says &quot;never use a LLM suggested word&quot;, and given he&#x27;s a sophisticated writer, it&#x27;s clearly a joke.

            Pangram 4 says it&#x27;s 100% human written, including the &quot;load-bearing&quot; sentence.

   2. tptacek · 1789734370 · focus · HN ↗

      It sure was.
   3. moffkalast · 1789769907 · focus · HN ↗

      How many parts per million did they say again? ;)

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.