I think it's good advice. I find it a bit funny the author said to not use a single word coming out of the LLM, but they probably did just that because I never heard a human being say "load-bearing" before but now it's all over the place, also used here. Or I don't get the irony.
The irony comes in the last sentence: "Readers won’t put their fingers on what’s wrong, but they’ll sense that you’ve become artificially-flavored." The joke is that he wrote the preceding sentences in the paragraph in a way that intentionally plays up written-by-LLM-isms so that you feel the sense being described in the quoted sentence.
thunfischtoast · · focus · HN ↗
duckerduck · · focus · HN ↗
LtWorf · · focus · HN ↗
skydhash · · focus · HN ↗
I have but it was a house construction worker explaining its practice on youtube.
jameshart · · focus · HN ↗
If not, it does risk planting the seed of doubt - have I been duped once again into reading tokenslop again?
Risky move. Surprised the LLM copy editor didn’t flag it.
swah · · focus · HN ↗
lkbm · · focus · HN ↗
[0] <a href="https://x.com/search?q=%22load%20bearing%22%20until%3A2020-01-01%20-wall&src=typed_query&f=top" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/search?q=%22load%20bearing%22%20until%3A2020-0...
inkcapmushroom · · focus · HN ↗
dilyevsky · · focus · HN ↗