‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Sex, AI, and the Apocalypse

234 points · 279 comments · Anon84

  1. arcticfox · · focus · HN ↗
    This whole "we can't trust the people warning us because they're either weirdos or involved" deal is such a strange angle when you can just start from zero, look at what's known to be happening right now, and draw a very straight line to catastrophe.

    It's like being concerned Oppenheimer and company are exaggerating when looking at the first nuclear tests at the same time.

    1. sph · · focus · HN ↗
      I really don’t know how we went from “there are people bullish about AI, and others that see it as an existential threat” to the complete reversal/psyop in the past few months where AI doomer has become a synonym of booster (?) and grouped with rationalist and other pro-AI weirdos.

      Like, I have never participated in the rationalist communities, I am not a neo-rx, I have always believed AI research to be an existential risk for humanity, and voicing this opinion now puts me in the same category as Yudkowsky and Altman/Amodei, the latter two being the total anathema to O.G. AI doomers like me because they’re the ones that are building the bloody thing

      I really do not get what is going on, but this role reversal smells like a massive psyop campaign in tech circles to just silence any form of dissent against AI.

      1. hollerith · · focus · HN ↗
        There's no connection between neo-rx and the Berkeley rationalists. A guy with a lot of expertise in Wikipedia shenanigans (David Gerard) manufactured a connection to smear the rationalists.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.