‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Sex, AI, and the Apocalypse

234 points · 279 comments · Anon84

  1. arcticfox · · focus · HN ↗
    This whole "we can't trust the people warning us because they're either weirdos or involved" deal is such a strange angle when you can just start from zero, look at what's known to be happening right now, and draw a very straight line to catastrophe.

    It's like being concerned Oppenheimer and company are exaggerating when looking at the first nuclear tests at the same time.

    1. bigbadfeline · · focus · HN ↗
      > when you can just start from zero, look at what's known to be happening right now

      Good idea, I wonder why none of the doomers have ever done it? They've never provided a good account of their prompts and environment, their models and training are completely closed too. All we have is "Trust me bro".

      > and draw a very straight line to catastrophe.

      Line from where? From a vaguely described and badly engineered experiment to "horror, doom, nukes, voodoo..."? The only straight line I can see is one of conflicts of interest.

      1. piloto_ciego · · focus · HN ↗
        It’s just nonsense man.

        Like, Yudkowski is a high school dropout who wrote a bunch of Harry Potter fanfic I cannot believe that people take the arguments he makes seriously.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.