‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Sex, AI, and the Apocalypse

234 points · 279 comments · Anon84

  1. petesergeant · · focus · HN ↗
    I'm going to be fucking irritated if we all die because BlueSky posters wanted to take pot-shots at the EA crowd. The Boy Who Cried Wolf is _also_ a story about how a community lost a child because of cynicism, and the people proudly declaring that they "know" every safety concern is just a marketing ploy also concerns me.
    1. devindotcom · · focus · HN ↗
      I think it's more of a Chicken Little situation. Then the wolf ate us all up.
    2. blactuary · · focus · HN ↗
      I have great news then, that absolutely isn't going to happen. And the EA crowd deserves all of the potshots and more
      1. dmd · · focus · HN ↗
        Wow I’m sure glad that’s settled then.
        1. blactuary · · focus · HN ↗
          Happy to be of service
    3. wtinasky · · focus · HN ↗

      [dead]

    4. lbrito · · focus · HN ↗
      I'd rather have the world end than live in a world where EAs are listened to or respected.
      1. againstapples · · focus · HN ↗
        I agree they’re kinda weird but are they really that bad?
        1. jplusequalt · · focus · HN ↗
          Yes. Sam Bankman Fried was/is an EA/rationalist (on the short list of biggest fraudsters in American history). So are the Zizian's (a murder cult). etc. etc.
          1. Viliam1234 · · focus · HN ↗
            SBF maybe, but Ziz declared rationalists to be their main enemy
            1. jplusequalt · · focus · HN ↗
              And? The Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks were both socialist factions who were coming from the same intellectual milieu, and they killed each other.
              1. Viliam1234 · · focus · HN ↗
                They also killed lots of unrelated people. Let's not take the argument far enough to claim that everyone who was ever killed by socialists must have been a socialist, too.

                Perhaps the author of the article is a rationalist, too. He certainly knows too much about them, cares too much, and the fact that he criticizes them only shows that there is some infighting among them.

                1. jplusequalt · · focus · HN ↗
                  >Let's not take the argument far enough to claim that everyone who was ever killed by socialists must have been a socialist, too.

                  Well it's a good thing I only mentioned the two groups who were explicitly socialists!

            2. shimman · · focus · HN ↗
              Yeah, similar to like how southern baptists declared evangelicals to be their enemy too for not being fanatical enough.

              Death cults are weird like that.

          2. againstapples · · focus · HN ↗
            I don’t see why I would judge a whole group based on isolated examples?
        2. Viliam1234 · · focus · HN ↗
          is dying really so bad compared to admitting that you were wrong and some weirdo was right?

          for many people the answer seems to be: not really.

        3. lbrito · · focus · HN ↗
          Yes.

          Their core belief system is morally abhorrent.

          1. againstapples · · focus · HN ↗
            What about their beliefs is morally abhorrent?
      2. 4bpp · · focus · HN ↗
        If you are serious about this preference, would you also be okay with a compromise solution where only you (and anyone else who feels the same) die, rather than taking everyone else with you?
    5. int_19h · · focus · HN ↗
      If we all die because of AI, it will be because of the uses that people like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and Palmer Luckey put it to, not because of a robot uprising.
      1. petesergeant · · focus · HN ↗
        Why not both? I honestly can’t fathom why people think — in an ultra-networked world — why LLMs can’t cause physical consequences.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.