‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Bonsai 2 27B: Near-Lossless Compression in a 9x Smaller Footprint

589 points · 200 comments · JonSchneider

  1. miffy900 · · focus · HN ↗
    I really wish people would stop saying N times smaller than something when making a comparison; that makes no sense - it's 1/9th (11.11%) the size. You don't get a smaller quantity by multiplying by a number greater than 1.0. You could instead reverse the subjects being compared - "the original model is 9x bigger than this new smaller, efficient model" or some such. That makes sense.

    I keep seeing this being used when people talk about efficiency or performance gains and it's just very unintuitive language.

    1. foobarbecue · · focus · HN ↗
      But we're cutting drug prices 500, 800, 1700%! Numbers nobody thought were possible.
      1. dofm · · focus · HN ↗
        It was hilarious that this is the only time his, er, meta-imaginary-gains intensifier made the statement literally true.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.