Thread

1. dzink · 1789687082 · focus · HN ↗

   “A government audit of family registries in Japan in 2010 uncovered more than 230,000 people listed as being aged 100 or older who were unaccounted for, some having died decades previously. The miscounting was attributed to patchy record-keeping and suspicions that some families may have tried to hide the deaths of elderly relatives in order to claim their pensions“ Thus they need to redo the audit in 2026.

   1. anyfoo · 1789688080 · focus · HN ↗

      I was also thinking about that, but that miscounting story is so old, notable, and well-known by now, that it's basically popular knowledge around the world. So I hope that the BBC, but especially also the Japanese government that the BBC was reporting on, are aware of that issue and have, by now, accounted for it.

      1. groundzeros2015 · 1789688990 · focus · HN ↗

         [dead]

         1. anyfoo · 1789689852 · focus · HN ↗

            Unlikely, as the quote about >230k misattributed people comes from the article itself. So even without taking into account that I generally expect more from the BBC, the author of this article seems to be at least aware of the fact.

            Be it as it may, and even if that's an AI-generated article (which I don't think so), the point is that the article is reporting on the Japanese government:

                Japanese authorities have called the trend an "existential crisis" with Prime Minister Sanae Takichi describing the decline as a "quiet emergency".
            

            And my hope that they have taken that past mistake into account seems to have some ground, given that the 100k total number that the current figures cite is by itself well below the then-figure of 230k misattributions.

            1. groundzeros2015 · 1789702208 · focus · HN ↗

               I guess we can’t discuss this because my comment was removed to protect the BBC.
   2. seb1204 · 1789689065 · focus · HN ↗

      I head similar stories. Also from Italy. Another aspect is that many 100+ year old have questionable birth certificates, as in the record of the birthday might be guessed. Different times back then.
   3. tokioyoyo · 1789690731 · focus · HN ↗

      That’s all true, but if you walk around “old people neighbourhoods” even within Tokyo, you’ll realize there are A LOT OF old people. Maybe it’s much more urbanized, and older people are more likely to still go out for groceries and stuff here. But even on the ground it feels like “yeah story tracks”.
   4. [deleted] · 1789696123 · focus · HN ↗

      [deleted]

   5. SapporoChris · 1789743848 · focus · HN ↗

      Of course the Japanese government hasn't been sitting idle for 16 years.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.demographic-research.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;volume&#x2F;26&#x2F;11" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.demographic-research.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;volume&#x2F;26&#x2F;11 &quot;In Japan 234,354 people registered before 1910 remained on the family registers in 2010, without being crossed out. They would have been 100 years old at least and represent 0.5% of the births recorded between 1872 and 1910. The impact of this group on life expectancy statistics, however, is effectively nil. &quot;

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.