‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Astra for Law

589 points · 689 comments · vertigoruntime

  1. halamadrid · · focus · HN ↗
    The need for actual lawyers will persist I think from my own experience. I attempted drafting a contract with some points myself using AI, but after several edits I wasn't sure if it was correct. Sending it to an actual lawyer ended up in so many corrections I couldn't imagine the first time. One big thing was the overly excessive protective clauses which didn't make sense for reality or conflicted with another.

    Its just like code I suppose, if you can read and understand and validate, you can use it to scale and otherwise it could end up being a vibe effort.

    1. Razengan · · focus · HN ↗
      > The need for actual lawyers will persist I think from my own experience.

      The outcome of a case shouldn't depend on someone's fallible ability to recall facts or convince other people or point their index finger*

      Law should generally be deterministic. One's CHA stat should have no bearing on justice.

      There should still be human judges, but the middleman between the judge and petitioner could easily be removed, and have generally been seen as leeches since forever anyway.

      Though, like how the USA opts to remain in the Stone Age with regard to tax filing because of lobbying by tax software companies, this faction of society will flail the hardest before they admit they're obsolete.

      ----

      * What's a lawyer's favorite programming language? Objection C.

      1. [deleted] · · focus · HN ↗

        [deleted]

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.