Thread

1. fortran77 · 1789675305 · focus · HN ↗

   Restricting private use of ALPR cameras? I don't like that. I like the protection our ALPR cameras give us. I moved to Missouri recently because I got sick of the crime and corruption in California. I think these "guardrails" go too far.

   1. petcat · 1789675584 · focus · HN ↗

      seems like a troll comment baiting people to shit on Missouri for some reason
   2. iAMkenough · 1789675856 · focus · HN ↗

      I think everyone you’re recording without consent would disagree with you. Might even be upset with you.

      How have you stopped crime and corruption by recording people without their knowledge?

   3. quickthrowman · 1789680615 · focus · HN ↗

      > The order directs the Missouri Department of Public Safety to create safeguards for state agencies and state-funded law enforcement departments using the automatic license plate readers.

      There’s no restrictions on private ALPRs in MO resulting from this executive order.

      An executive order is a directive for government agencies under the executive branch, not private organizations.

      It’s against the rules to ask if you read the article, so I won’t do that.

      1. fortran77 · 1789747133 · focus · HN ↗

         I read the article and he's requesting that people follow these guidelines, and asked the State Legislature to enact laws. I won't ask if you read the article.
   4. lenerdenator · 1789739279 · focus · HN ↗

      Depending upon where, exactly, you moved to in Missouri, I don't think you'll necessarily see the drop in crime and corruption you might have hoped for.

      And I say this as a life-long Missouri resident and Mizzou grad.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.