‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

T. Rex Had a Body Temperature of 97°F

71 points · 124 comments · marojejian

  1. lioeters · · focus · HN ↗
    From the paper, that is: 36.3 ± 2.5°C.
    1. Galilyou · · focus · HN ↗
      Phew! Thank you! I feel for the ungodly fahrenheit again
      1. nmoon · · focus · HN ↗
        Fahrenheit is the superior measure
        1. WarmWash · · focus · HN ↗
          Better for day to day life, worse for science and engineering.
          1. msm_ · · focus · HN ↗
            Is it really better for day to day life? I am certain that it only appears so because you're used to it. I think for day to day life they're both roughly equivalent.

            Of course, for me Celsius is more natural and intuitive, but again - that's because I'm used to it.

            1. WarmWash · · focus · HN ↗
              You can basically put a "%" after a fahrenheit temperature and read it as "percentage of a really hot day" and you'll get a pretty good idea what it feels like outside.

              It's pretty well calibrated as a 0-100 scale for human temperature perception.

              1. folkrav · · focus · HN ↗
                It doesn't map nearly as well for those of us who regularly have temperatures under -17C/0F in the winter. For me Celsius maps a LOT better to the temperatures I actually deal with year round. -17C is, accounting for wind chill, an average-ish winter day, that I'd consider pretty comfortable at this time of the year, assuminv appropriate clothing.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.