Is it really better for day to day life? I am certain that it only appears so because you're used to it. I think for day to day life they're both roughly equivalent.
Of course, for me Celsius is more natural and intuitive, but again - that's because I'm used to it.
You can basically put a "%" after a fahrenheit temperature and read it as "percentage of a really hot day" and you'll get a pretty good idea what it feels like outside.
It's pretty well calibrated as a 0-100 scale for human temperature perception.
I moved from a cold climate to a tropical climate and let me assure you there's no human universal understanding of what's comfortably hot or cold, definitely not to the point of putting a percentage on it. I can walk around in a T-shirt and shorts at 17C (62f) while locals will be wrapping up in scarves and talking about how freezing it is. Meanwhile they'll be fairly comfortable at 35C (95f), at least if the humidity isn't high, and I'll be stuck in with the AC blasting.
So in other words Fahrenheit is a western centric measurement (or at least, temperature climate centric), while Celsius is universal.
The subjective experience doesn’t really matter because many places in the US will experience a 100 degree F range over an entire year. So it’s not the “comfortable range” but the actual range you’ll get in many parts of the US (whether you like it or not).
lioeters · · focus · HN ↗
Galilyou · · focus · HN ↗
nmoon · · focus · HN ↗
WarmWash · · focus · HN ↗
msm_ · · focus · HN ↗
Of course, for me Celsius is more natural and intuitive, but again - that's because I'm used to it.
WarmWash · · focus · HN ↗
It's pretty well calibrated as a 0-100 scale for human temperature perception.
esperent · · focus · HN ↗
So in other words Fahrenheit is a western centric measurement (or at least, temperature climate centric), while Celsius is universal.
nkrisc · · focus · HN ↗