‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Towards Self-Driving Codebases

123 points · 100 comments · wilhelmklopp

  1. vb-8448 · · focus · HN ↗
    > Global memory

    I don't get why we need global memory for code? Aren't code comments (even if invented for humans) the ideal place where to put "memories"?

    1. rrr_oh_man · · focus · HN ↗
      LLMs also do not have anything like memory, by design. Everything bolted on that smells like memory or is being called memory is a crutch, at best. Not being pedantic, I just think this aspect is lost on a lot of people.
      1. Terr_ · · focus · HN ↗
        Also, when we humans are tricked into perceiving a remote mind, we automatically assume it has a memory like us, or at least like large animals.

        In other words, there's a story-document between a SherlockHolmesBot and UserPlaceholder that's growing like a crystal formation. Some software sees "Sherlock Homes Says" and then "performs" the dialogue at us, and we then assume Sherlock Holmes exists with a mind and memory, rather than being a facet of a text-story.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.