Thread

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

1. braunjohnson · 1789923022 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

2. 13415 · 1789930398 · focus · HN ↗

   IMHO the Readme is too verbose, it contains a lot of information that should be somewhere else than a landing page.
3. luckydata · 1789931678 · focus · HN ↗

   the readme written by Claude is annoying. At least it explains what the project does but imho the writing needs a healthy human pass to remove all the bullshit phrasing "Gorai stops pretending otherwise..." perfect example.

   1. Bluestein · 1789934601 · focus · HN ↗

      It is such a shame. It is really off-putting. And the sad thing is that perfectly fine projects might otherwise be shunned because of the language being sloppified.-

      1. mitxela · 1789934701 · focus · HN ↗

         It's like a litmus test, or a bowl without brown M&Ms, or a car with a broken windshield. If the most obvious things are wrong, we save energy by heuristicising the whole thing is wrong.
   2. autuni · 1789972614 · focus · HN ↗

      The description does not read as if the person who had an LLM make this for them knows too much about robotics. That makes it really hard to trust the project, you don't get away with as many inefficiencies in design and code quality on limited hardware with real-time requirements. Which could still be fine for prototyping, but in the description it explicitly says it's meant for quick production ready systems. Sounds like a nightmare combination to me, or for whoever the trageted "prosumers" are.
4. therein · 1789934878 · focus · HN ↗

   So it is like a virtual CAN bus?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.