‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Iran school bombing: grounds to believe US was behind atrocity, UN finds

354 points · 307 comments · hebelehubele

  1. Wildgoose · · focus · HN ↗
    Seeing as it was a "double tap" it was clearly a deliberate target. Bomb the school, wait until officers from the nearby base with kids at the school arrive to try and rescue their daughters and hit it again. Clearly a war crime, possibly using Israeli targeting information, which clouds which State is ultimately responsible.
    1. jvanderbot · · focus · HN ↗
      Yes, the definition of war crime is not "intentionally targeted building" it is "intentionally targeted building that it knew was non-military and full of civilians". If you plausibly believed it to be a military target, then it's plausibly not a war crime.

      The question about whether US launched the missiles is not really in dispute, the intent and knowledge is in dispute. NYT did a great analysis essentially concluding it was plausibly a mistake, not an intentional or indiscriminate civilian attack.

      More here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49739018#49741081">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49739018#49741081

      1. pphysch · · focus · HN ↗
        How can anyone take this argument seriously when the DoW was simultaneously committing dozens of extrajudicial executions of small boat users in the Gulf?
        1. jvanderbot · · focus · HN ↗
          What is there to take seriously regarding this strike other than the facts as presented?

          There were 900 strikes in 12h, and only one target involved a strike on a school, and huge coincidence that target was a dozen meters from a military compound and was in fact part of that military compound not long ago.

          It&#x27;s quite easy to accept that this was a horrific mistake. Whether you agree with the idea of striking Iran at all is up to you, but once they &quot;went hot&quot;, precision strikes on military targets were successful in 900 cases, and it&#x27;s plausible that one precision strike was issued incorrectly.

          It doesn&#x27;t bring back the kiddos. It also doesn&#x27;t mean it&#x27;s a war crime. It&#x27;s right to be angry about that strike or even the larger war if you oppose it, but spurious legal justifications for outrage aren&#x27;t required - it can be wrong even when legally justified or plausibly just a mistake.

          1. albatross79 · · focus · HN ↗
            &quot;the kiddos&quot;
            1. jvanderbot · · focus · HN ↗
              I have no idea why this is in scare quotes. It&#x27;s a term of endearment, and I&#x27;m saddened by their deaths as much as anyone.
              1. IOT_Apprentice · · focus · HN ↗
                No you aren’t. Your repeated comments show otherwise. You have trivialized their deaths, ignored other findings and demonstrated a distinct lack of empathy. Do better.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.