‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

How GLM built its own inference infrastructure

411 points · 285 comments · whiteros_e

  1. tefkah · · focus · HN ↗

    [dead]

    1. binsquare · · focus · HN ↗
      Given the rate of improvement, why is this deranged?
      1. sixeyes · · focus · HN ↗
        because the rate of improvement is fairly stalled?
        1. scarmig · · focus · HN ↗
          Yeah, it's been over a week since a Millennium Problem was solved. AI has hit a wall.
          1. etamponi · · focus · HN ↗
            It was not solved. ~OpenAI~ Buckmaster and Alpöge found one (or a few) singularities in the forced version of the Navier-Stokes equations. Then magically 2 weeks later OpenAI found them too. Again, I am not saying this is not a great feat. I am just saying that everyone should be a bit more careful when making statements about RSI.
            1. red75prime · · focus · HN ↗
              Buckmaster and Alpöge has found a forced finite-time singularity for the 3D incompressible Euler equations (and two other types) building on the work by Diego Córdoba and Luis Martínez-Zoroa with the assistance of Anthropic and OpenAI models. Then OpenAI found a forced finite-time singularity for the Navier-Stokes equations.

              TL;DR Buckmaster and Alpöge haven't solved Navier-Stokes blow up.

              How information can get so distorted when it's trivial to fact check?

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.