Pangram is definitely at the forefront of AI/Human detection. To me though, I think that the bigger issue in a post-AI world is that human authorship (if it is relevant and can be proven) is only part of the ultimate problem. The baseline of Common AI output really can't be ignored -- content to be meaningful needs to do something to expand the idea spade beyond AI. Humans can be original and NOT exceed that baseline. Moreover, AI detection penalizes people who use AI as an adjunct to their individual talents to create new things. To me then, the point is not whether Pangram works well -- it's whether it answers the right question.
jonathan_aberma · · focus · HN ↗