‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Breaking the 1.58-bit Barrier for Ternary LLMs

245 points · 41 comments · matt_d

  1. kittikitti · · focus · HN ↗
    Thank you for sharing this. I like to test out running LLM's on edge computing with limited RAM and GPU/CPU so this research will have practical implications on my activities. I also appreciated how the authors formulated 1.58 (it's log_2(3)) because that was embarrassingly confusing for me when I was first introduced to ternary LLM's.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.