‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Backups Aren't Simple

359 points · 225 comments · afilipovski

  1. chasil · · focus · HN ↗
    For my Oracle Linux systems, I rely on the vendor ReaR RPM package for the baseline backup. This is similar to the "Ignite" utility that I used in my HP-UX days.

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;relax-and-recover.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;relax-and-recover.org&#x2F;

    This is two-fold useful, first as it enables boot from backup media for total recovery, second in that it creates a backup.tar.gz that holds everything that was not explitictly ignored in the &#x2F;etc&#x2F;rear&#x2F;local.conf file.

    I&#x27;m running Oracle databases on these systems (and the local.conf is configured to ignore the datafile directories). I have standby databases (not Dataguard in that I don&#x27;t have online redolog replication) that allow me to recover them to the primary in a disaster, with some loss of committed transactions.

    I finally have rsync configured for some scratch temporary files.

    I have dallied with btrfs snapshot replication for home directories (in a loopback mount). My vendor support (via a CSI number) has been on and off, so I don&#x27;t use btrfs in areas that we need it most.

    My replacements do not like the complexity (and I am retiring).

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.