‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

128 points · 168 comments · Brajeshwar

  1. mikae1 · · focus · HN ↗
    When was the last time you felt excitement for a macOS release?

    Me? Snow Leopard.

    When I transitioned to Linux I rediscovered OS excitement. I'm on KDE Plasma now and every update has exciting features that serves my interests.

    1. Telaneo · · focus · HN ↗
      I'm stuck trying to figure out what new stuff they could add. Sidecar was neat, but I never need it. I'm very happy on Cinnamon on Linux, which is probably less featured than KDE (haven't daily driven it to confirm), which just confirms I don't actually need or want user-facing new features. I need stability.

      I think Apple realise this. There are no genuine new OS features to be added, so they just shuffle things around so that things are changing and thus seem fresh and hip. For anyone who cares about stability and doesn't want to relearn everything they shuffle around, this is nothing but a negative, but Apple et al. have no other levers to pull (well, there's the AI lever, but that's also generally not a positive in and of itself).

      Maybe there are new OS features that could be useful, but creating and integrating them in a way that's actually helpful is just such an ordeal that nobody will do it.

      1. noir_lord · · focus · HN ↗
        Cinnamon was what I used before KDE, I like KDE a great deal but I also liked Cinnamon a great deal, if I had to go back it wouldn't cause me any issues, I only switched for Wayland support.

        So if you are happy on Cinnamon stay there (and it's Wayland support has caught up a lot).

        They both do an excellent job of not causing me pain, working the way I want and respecting me as a user, that's what a DE should be, if I have to consider the DE more than in passing it's failing at been a DE.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.