Thread

1. Chance-Device · 1789588624 · focus · HN ↗

   This isn’t really about AI, it’s about a culture where threats and coercion in service of one’s own ideology have become normalised.

   1. nrmitchi · 1789590752 · focus · HN ↗

      From a more... pessimistic/optomistic point of view (I'm really not sure which applies here, it depends how you look at it) It is also about a culture with absolutely no safety net, where AI and increased automation moving into someones field (in this case, graphic design work) isn't just "oh, less people will need my services" and more "My income will completely disappear and I will be broke/homeless faster than I can possibly learn something else fast enough to compete with the omnipotent AI".

      The way to make these transitions less aggressive on everyone is to not have it tied directly to whether or not someone can afford to eat.

      1. Chance-Device · 1789591365 · focus · HN ↗

         I think that’s letting people off the hook too easily. This sort of mob behaviour is simply normal. Normal means something that happens often, not something we find admirable. With a safety net it would be the same sort of thing - people decide that x is bad and dogpile it to get their dopamine. Some people really like the dogpiling, others like it less, but it calls to an ugly part of our psychology.

         1. nrmitchi · 1789593308 · focus · HN ↗

            I agree that people like the dogpile, but those dog-piles are normally starts by someone who feels like they are personally victimized and threatened by whatever action they are objecting to.

            People take things very personally when their core livelihood and ability to support themselves are threatened.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.