‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Training a 4B model to produce 81% faster query plans than Postgres

702 points · 144 comments · polyphilz

  1. huahaiy · · focus · HN ↗
    81%is nothing. It is not hard to be more than 3x better than Postgres [1]. And you don’t need a model to do that, let alone a 4B model. How much additional compute is needed to just run that model?

    [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;datalevin&#x2F;datalevin&#x2F;tree&#x2F;master&#x2F;benchmarks&#x2F;JOB-bench" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;datalevin&#x2F;datalevin&#x2F;tree&#x2F;master&#x2F;benchmark...

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.