‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Tell HN: An inside view of Montana's new biotech law

34 points · 26 comments · niklas_anzinger

  1. zachthewf · · focus · HN ↗
    Thanks for posting - have been following from afar and very interested in this area. Sorry for the naive questions, I am a software guy new to biotech.

    - How have things looked since passage? Has there been a lot of interest from companies and patients or is demand the bottleneck? Not that many people in Montana...

    - What sort of new business models does this open up? e.g. Roivant for abandoned phase 1 assets?

    - Does this lower the barrier for treating new indications, e.g. age related conditions like sarcopenia?

    - Any particular rules on telehealth?

    1. niklas_anzinger · · focus · HN ↗
      - Strong demand from biotechs (first approval decision made and public, Parley Neurotech), we're talking several dozens with $5-300m in funding each

      - Clinics a bit more lagging, because licensing takes up to 90 days; in a few weeks we hopefully see the first clinic

      - Business models: I'd personally be very excited about open-sourcing phase-1 assets to encourage further development to better drugs by more people

      - Yes, this was an explicit hope from the geroscience community to address gaps e.g. in frailty, age-induces diseases with multiple possible endpoints

      - No explicit rules on telehealth, but administration needs to be in Montana under a brick-and-mortar clinic; telehealth probably possible within those limits

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.