‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Can we stop with the uptime percentages?

146 points · 115 comments · surprisetalk

  1. hx8 · · focus · HN ↗
    > We say something like:

    > GitHub Actions: 12 hours affected in the last 30 days (98.31% uptime).

    This is trying to shine the most favorable possible light onto a deteriorating situation. It doesn't take away from the fact that most businesses have measurable missed revenue in downtime. Customers that shop somewhere else, ads that were never severed, leads that grew a little colder. 12 hours of downed GitHub results in millions of dollars of lost developer productivity that was externalized by Microsoft to other companies.

    We shouldn't be trying to spin downtime as "just a few hours a month." Those hours cost real dollars.

    1. usernametaken29 · · focus · HN ↗
      Then again if you’re a business relying on GitHub enterprise you have an SLA and you can and WILL charge GitHub for failing their SLA. Usually there’s a real measurable dollar value tied to that SLA per dollar and it’s not cheap. What surprises me in particular is that the global API and the GitHub EE API are the same which is a big no no. This is even more surprising given the fact that paying GitHub customers are clearly the minority both in numbers and code velocity. My assumption would be that GitHub is keeping EE up and the rest of free or pro users just have to suck it up. If that’s not even the case then it’s only a matter of very short time until GitHub will see businesses leave to more reliable competitors
      1. datadrivenangel · · focus · HN ↗
        SLAs don't relly get you meaningful money back, they give you a way to get out of long contracts early and switch to a better vendor.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.