They are simply looking to steer AI policy discussions. It's basically an in-house think tank. It has all the trappings, especially with ominous prognostications like:
Today’s AI systems have impressive capabilities and the rapid pace of innovation suggests we’re now approaching artificial general intelligence (AGI), a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities of the human brain.
Not sure we are anywhere close to all the cognitive capabilities of the human brain... not even a severely lobotomized one.
That's not true and its exactly the point - real life data is noisy, difficult to parse, and ultimately often ambiguous. Text is the distilled information. It's significantly easier to distilled text into a likely response than it is to distill into lessons a continuous data stream whose contents are partially controlled by your own actions.
nsagent · · focus · HN ↗
Eueudhsbsj32 · · focus · HN ↗
In which capabilities are AI not already close to or beyond that of a human brain?
idiotsecant · · focus · HN ↗
chpatrick · · focus · HN ↗
idiotsecant · · focus · HN ↗
chpatrick · · focus · HN ↗