Thread

1. 0x69420 · 1789571110 · focus · HN ↗

   now imagine how many other devs and maintainers are contemplating this but just haven't been pushed to their personal breaking point yet. or take note of how many, when asked about the spam problem, just nervously go "yeah it's kinda rough haha...". or how many will vent about it on their twitter-like of choice with increasing frequency.

   remember hacktoberfest 2020? that's just all public-facing source 365 days a year now, except instead of "updated README.md" it's some vaguely-plausible fix... then you read the PR body and someone couldn't even be bothered to, or, just as likely couldn't explain it themselves. and that sort of sinking dread sets in.

   1. jwcooper · 1789571695 · focus · HN ↗

      I would guess we'll start seeing more open source projects with much tighter restrictions on who can participate. Closed contributions and heavily automated (or even closed) issue tracking is probably already happening and will spread faster.

      I entirely sympathize with these maintainers too. I've had 2 instances where an LLM has surfaced a bug and I just couldn't get myself to open a PR and dump more work onto these maintainers, even after manually writing one up (neither were critical bugs, it's fine).

      Seeing popular projects (like hermes) having 5k issues and 5k pull requests is madness.

      1. Marsymars · 1789573769 · focus · HN ↗

         > Seeing popular projects (like hermes) having 5k issues and 5k pull requests is madness.

         It's actually got nearly 30k open pull requests!

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.