‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Wax motor

525 points · 107 comments · mhb

  1. limaoscarjuliet · · focus · HN ↗
    Wikipedia page has a small error. It shows an actuator (i.e. wax motor) described as thermostatic radiator valve <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wax_motor#&#x2F;media&#x2F;File:Thermische_Stellantriebe,_Thermische_Antriebe,_Fussbodenheizung,_thermal_actuator,_actuateur_thermique.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wax_motor#&#x2F;media&#x2F;File:Thermisc...

    These are two separate things: thermostat will close and open based on surrounding temp., the actuator on the other hand opens and closes based on energizing a heating element that is driven by a separate thermostat.

    Wax motors are pretty cool things. They rarely fail and do their job even in damp environments. I take care of my better half&#x27;s hotel with approx 100 of these installed and we replace one of these once every couple of years.

    1. jansan · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; They rarely fail and do their job even in damp environments. I take care of my better half&#x27;s hotel with approx 100 of these installed and we replace one of these once every couple of years.

      I had to replace about half of them within the first ten years of usage in our floor heating. It may have been a bad batch, but I would definitely not claim that the rarely fail. My car did not fail once during that time.

      1. IAmBroom · · focus · HN ↗
        But I&#x27;m betting you performed maintenance on your car in that period.
      2. limaoscarjuliet · · focus · HN ↗
        I bet poor manufacturer, or poor quality, or poor batch. Also maybe NC (normally closed) vs NO (normally open) behave differently? In any case, the ones we use are solid, especially given they are installed on damp AC ice-water circuits.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.